Wincapita scam has been in the headlines in Finland lately. For those unaware of the case, Wincapita is turning out to be the biggest enonomic crime ever in Finland. The company collected money from the credulous investors, promising 400% profits through revolutionary computerized forex trading system. There are numerous similar kind of trading platforms in the internet, some of them real, quite a few scams.
Wincapita is turning out to be a scam of the worst kind. The company probably never did any forex trading at all. It is a classic Ponzi scheme: the investors were rewarded for recruiting new members, the first ones got their "profits" from the incoming money of new recruitees, and therefore "proved" that the promised profits were realistic. The system worked as long as the cash flow from newcomers was wide enough for the scammers to pay back to the promised cash, but finally the construction became too big, the media paid attention to the shady company, and the thing collapsed, leaving behind thousands of people who lost their savings.
The eagerness with which normally careful Finns paid thousands of euros to a company owned by unknown bodies, registered somewhere in South America and promising unrealistically high profits (I mean, if I could make 400% profits in forex trading, why on earth would I bother to scrape together investments from Finnish farmers?) is stunning. The trick is a combination of jealousy, greed and trust. When your mechanic quits the job because he has enough money for a two-year-holiday in Pattaya and your sister-in-law drives to your courtyard in a brand new Mercedes offering you a piece of the pie, your shields drop. The scam spreads virally, and effectively.
Could we tap into this viral power of communities? User communities have developed for example surfboards, rock´n´roll, so innovation does live in communities. But I suppose we cannot use the traditional child upbringing methods of bribery, threats and blackmail to get the people to participate.
Or could we? Bribery actually works, or at least vanity; Eric Von Hippel has proven in his studies that in lead user communities people search for acceptance from their peers, and are willing to put enormous efforts in finding working solutions for challenges, willingly sharing the results. The method has been effectively used in open source comminities.
Could we also use threat and blackmail? "People. We need YOU to take responsibility for your wellbeing and to develop better P2P social services, or else..." Else what? "...or else we run out of money to take care of you and you need to be happy with less-than-satisfactory healthcare services", maybe.
Or can we use jealousy? "If you participate, you get this nice, tailor-made service, which your neighbor does not have". Would that do the trick and bring also the neighbors in the viral service development pyramid scheme?